Hacker News

Favorites Setup
Decade-old RAM is making a comeback (theverge.com)
2026-10-10 Sat | 81 points by 1potato | original
[−]hypfer · 2026-10-11 Sun 06:54 UTC · link
Love the link preview tagline. Thanks TheVerge

"Somehow, DDR4 has returned."

__

Besides that, wasn't DDR4 good enough for everything we did, anyway?

At least I did not notice all that much of a difference when migrating to my current DDR5 system other than the CPU being massively more performant. Though I am sure that the memory did play some role there.

Clanker claims that the felt absolute latency between decent DDR4 and DDR5 should be similar, while bandwidth might be lower, apparently? Something something CAS latency.

[−]t0mas88 · 2026-10-11 Sun 07:16 UTC · link
For daily office use there is much more benefit in having more memory than having faster memory. Because apps all started using more memory. Especially anything Google Chrome related.

If you have some unused extra memory it will be used as disk cache, which also helps in the responsiveness of a desktop. Waiting for the disk is orders of magnitude slower than reading from memory cache.

[−]avaer · 2026-10-11 Sun 06:56 UTC · link
It was obvious AI would further stratify the haves and have-nots, but I was too naive to realize the tech of the have-nots could literally just regress. Has such a thing ever happened before in tech?
[−]ssl-3 · 2026-10-11 Sun 07:20 UTC · link
Sorta, kinda. For a long time, a new PC tended to be built with new parts. New motherboard, new storage, new CPU, new graphics card. New.

During every mining crunch that made GPUs very expensive, we sometimes went backwards on parts of new builds. A used GPU from years ago was often a more-viable choice than a new model in any kind of condition.

edit to add: A lot of folks in 3D printing like to have a small computer driving the machine, especially with tinkerer-friendly hobbyist printers of yore. That often meant some manner of Raspberry Pi because it was inexpensive-enough, small, and a known quantity that was simple to deal with in an appliance-like way.

During the covid-era chip shortages, Pi hardware was expensive, hard to find, or often both. So folks started driving their printers with things like old cell phones or cheap Android TV boxes instead.

[−]AndrewDavis · 2026-10-11 Sun 08:41 UTC · link
I remember getting a Radeon card on sale for about $180AUD in 2012ish. And 4 years later looking for an upgrade and discovering the cheapest higher performing card was at least $300 Aud.

I eventually upgraded to an RX 570 in 2018, and hit the same problem 5 years later.

So as far as loe to mid range cards are concerned you can wait 5 years and still have to pay more to replace it for an upgrade.

[−]anonymous908213 · 2026-10-11 Sun 07:37 UTC · link
Yes, the previous fad (crypto) killed consumer GPU prices for good. I don't believe anything has compared on price-performance to a 1080 in the 10 years since.

Also the enshittification of software might count? You used to own Photoshop for life, now you're expected to pay a subscription for life. And legal onslaught, too. Encryption and consumer VPNs are on the chopping block in much of the world at the rate things are going. The end goal of governments and corporations alike is to remove the ability of consumers to own hardware they control. We are rapidly moving towards a future where you will only be able to access the internet and government services with a "trusted device", which will be a thin client with a TPM, biometric verification, telemetry of everything you do on it, and which will require paying an ongoing subscription to use.

[−]ssl-3 · 2026-10-11 Sun 07:55 UTC · link
As far as I can tell, in terms of MSRP, 980ti was $649 at launch. 1080 and 1080ti were both $699 when they hit the market.

$699 in 2015 (when the 1080 was new) is ~$975 today, adjusted for inflation.

$975 is pretty close to the launch MSRP of a 5080, which is "just" $999. (We can't actually buy them for $999, of course, but we couldn't usually get 1080 cards at MSRP during the mining frenzy a decade ago either.)

[−]swiftcoder · 2026-10-11 Sun 09:13 UTC · link
The big difference here is that by the time the 2080 had saturated the market, you could regularly find a 1080 for ~$300 (I paid $275 for an EVGA B-stock model).

Whereas today, with the 5000 series in the market for quite a while already, a 4080 is still well over MSRP

[−]flaunf221 · 2026-10-11 Sun 10:09 UTC · link
Back in the day 1080 was top of the line. For couple of generations now it's xx90 lineup.

You could say that there was Titan but in practice they were not seriously considered. At least for gaming.

[−]crostlybostly · 2026-10-11 Sun 08:16 UTC · link
I don’t see that at all obvious.

Businesses are competing like crazy to make algorithms that are in high demand. AI could theoretically let people and create new things that they would never be able to otherwise.

It is entitled to thing that people wanting GPUs and new PCs for gaming and hobbies is a more valid use. And if someone values it, all they have to do is pay the market price.

[−]erelong · 2026-10-11 Sun 07:07 UTC · link
[−]203ej0h4h43 · 2026-10-11 Sun 07:12 UTC · link
row, row, row your hammer, gently down the bit flip stream...
[−]Sesse__ · 2026-10-11 Sun 07:18 UTC · link
A friend and I bought RAM for our aging servers at eBay in 2024. That was 512GB (16x32GB -- we split it equally) of DDR4 ECC 2133MHz, registered. For… $536.86 plus shipping.

Somehow it feels like we got a pretty good deal, in retrospect. (My server has been since replaced, and I can tell you, 256GB of DDR5 ECC was more than that! There's been a further doubling or two of prices since I bought, though. I think I could maybe sell half the RAM and finance the entire server…)

[−]t0mas88 · 2026-10-11 Sun 07:32 UTC · link
Currently 128GB of normal non-ECC DDR5 as a 2x64 set is around 2000 euro and increasing...
[−]Keyframe · 2026-10-11 Sun 08:34 UTC · link
One would think just some classes and forms of RAM increased in price. I have 128 GB (2 x 64GB DDR5 SO-DIMM) in my home NAS. Home NAS. Those nice ugreen DXP8800 Plus thingamabobs. It'd be over 2k euros for RAM alone now. Ridiculous. Add to that two SN850X 4TB SSDs, and 8 (+1 unpacked spare) IronWolves Pro and it's now a serious worth.

No end in sight.

[−]trollbridge · 2026-10-11 Sun 07:36 UTC · link
2x16GB costs around $190 right now, or closer to $375 if you want ECC.

Not much cheaper than DDR5.

[−]flanked-evergl · 2026-10-11 Sun 07:41 UTC · link
My Home PC is from 2019, it has DDR4, it gets most things done, and I have never felt it was sluggish or anything. Maybe not the best gaming rig, but I get by.
[−]OptionX · 2026-10-11 Sun 07:57 UTC · link
I built my current home pc on the cusp of the transition of ddr4 to ddr5 and ddr5 was at the time out of my budget so I went with ddr4 and I can still play modern games fine with 32gb even at 2k. I might not max out everything but that was never a priority for me. Usually besides resolution I seldom touch the graphical settings if the game is running ok. In fact the only thing I upgraded one it until now was my GPU since that was a holdover from my previous one.

Home server also runs ddr4 and does ok, but that has been hitting more cpu bottlenecks now rather than memory.

That said its kinda sad personal users are getting tossed back a generation due to current generation ram being almost all gobbled up for AI.

[−]flanked-evergl · 2026-10-11 Sun 11:23 UTC · link
We are getting tossed back a generation, but we are also becoming as rare as chicken teeth. Most people do not own a Desktop PC, most people don't even own a Laptop any longer. To do the most good for the most people requires datacentres at the moment, and it will probably remain like that for the forseeable future.
[−]uzerkayat · 2026-10-11 Sun 07:43 UTC · link
I think in upcoming days everything gonna be making comeback previously like one or two years ago I was thinking the mobile price are so dropped that mobile phones gonna be like as cheap as possible but now after the AI their price are going as high as possible and same with the computers and laptops and all.
[−]hypfer · 2026-10-11 Sun 07:44 UTC · link
I mean arguably, this is good.

The amount of waste produced due to phones not receiving new batteries and software updates was utterly insane, given what goes into making them.

[−]adrithmetiqa · 2026-10-11 Sun 08:08 UTC · link
100% agree. This is generally a good news story. The e-waste issue is one of the darker aspects of tech which is mostly ignored. We should promote brands like Fairphone and Framework that are trying to make a difference here. Reuse more of your kit!
[−]user_7832 · 2026-10-11 Sun 09:16 UTC · link
It's good if you're a tech guy in silicon valley with a good salary who used to upgrade every year to the latest pro max.

It's terrible if you're a labourer in India who buys phones under 10k INR (~100 USD) when your salary is 20k INR per month.

Unfortunately there are way more in the latter category than the former, and most of them won't know what ram is. They'll just be paying more and getting less going forward for a few years.

(Source, the salaries and phones I've seen of the staff at office. And we're in a major region you've likely heard of, not some tiny rural village.)

[−]flanked-evergl · 2026-10-11 Sun 07:52 UTC · link
The wages of the West's deliberate deindustrialization and deliberate dependence on Asian manufacturing.

30 refineries were closed in Europe in the past 15 years about, and that is just a small example of a pathological situation.

[−]hdgvhicv · 2026-10-11 Sun 09:10 UTC · link
I was reading that oil from the Middle East had to go to South Korea to be refined before being shipped as diesel to Australia.

Cost of hiring an oil tanker has ballooned massively (like 40 fold) since America decided to bomb its supply chain, so these long supply chains are massively expensive.

The Republican Party has decided that running a world of global free trade was no longer desired. America wont pay the price for another decade or two, but it will.

[−]fennecbutt · 2026-10-11 Sun 09:25 UTC · link
Well capitalism is responsible for that.

I think in a few hundred years we'll have learnt what a disgusting, poisonous system it is.

[−]lproven · 2026-10-11 Sun 10:42 UTC · link
I think in a few hundred years the very small number of survivors of humanity will be living in caves and huts in the high Arctic and in a greening slowly-reafforesting Antarctic, they'll be hunter-gatherers with maybe some simple small-scale unmechanised agriculture, and they won't have money. Maybe a barter system for a few.

Among the many other things they won't have is an economic model.

[−]flanked-evergl · 2026-10-11 Sun 11:21 UTC · link
Europe and America chooses to make things unsustainable and unprofitable to do in Europe, and then blame Capitalism.

As you like … but blaming capitalism is not going to bring industry back.

[−]dr_kiszonka · 2026-10-11 Sun 08:22 UTC · link
We can get refurbished phones with 8 GB LPDDR5 for less than regular DDR5 modules.

LPDDR5 is slower but maybe a small cluster could be useful?

[−]gblargg · 2026-10-11 Sun 08:59 UTC · link
Maybe more efficient code will make a comeback.
[−]as1mov · 2026-10-11 Sun 09:51 UTC · link
I have bridge to sell you if you think that is likely.
[−]ahartmetz · 2026-10-11 Sun 10:25 UTC · link
If the trend to disregard performance with ever-increasing CPU power had not stopped, C++ and Rust wouldn't be as popular as they are. Something did change with the end of the free lunch.
[−]mitxela · 2026-10-11 Sun 11:27 UTC · link
They are popular among a certain hobbyist community, just as they were in 2024. They are not popular among application developers. Remember how FAANG app developers keep bumping into platform limits, such as the old Android limit of 65k classes in an app, and necessitating workarounds?
[−]walrus01 · 2026-10-11 Sun 07:49 UTC · link
Not even DDR4... Things are this bad:

It's quite preposterous to think that an old 256GB RAM DDR3-using dual xeon server (128GB per NUMA node) that I had sitting around on a shelf gathering dust significantly appreciated in value over the past 12 months. But it's factually correct, looking at what comparables sell for for on eBay.

[−]donmb · 2026-10-11 Sun 07:56 UTC · link
I recently reactivated a 10 years old Kindle as an AI-Story-Generator (https://github.com/donmb1/ai-story-generator). Old hardware is valueable and with AI you can do great things with it.
[−]hypfer · 2026-10-11 Sun 08:00 UTC · link
So LLMs are simultaneously making new hardware unaffordable, while also making old hardware usable again.

That too sounds like an actually good development all things considered. For the planet, anyway. And with the big caveat of that cloud tether, though just for scaffolding.

[−]OtomotO · 2026-10-11 Sun 08:04 UTC · link
> That too sounds like an actually good development all things considered

It would be good if we would use less resources.

But we are not.

It's just that some people don't get the newer resources.

[−]WindyMiller · 2026-10-11 Sun 08:36 UTC · link
Old e-readers were already usable. Generating extruded story-like product on them when they're already perfectly capable of displaying the vast majority of human literature doesn't make them any more usable.
[−]rwyinuse · 2026-10-11 Sun 08:07 UTC · link
Thanks for sharing, maybe it's time to buy some more old Kindles... I use bunch as smart paintings (with changing pictures generated locally with stable diffusion), and of course Home Assistant dashboard. They are awesome little machines.
[−]dgellow · 2026-10-11 Sun 09:33 UTC · link
Look at CrowPanel, you can get nice e-ink devices made for development, at a reasonable price. I have a small 2.13in esp32 board, I spent some time yesterday making it into a pocket flashcard device for my German courses. The energy consumption is minimal, small form factor, easy to flash via esptool or arduino utils
[−]simonklitj · 2026-10-11 Sun 09:40 UTC · link
Please. There are so many human stories out there—read those.
[−]PunchyHamster · 2026-10-11 Sun 10:40 UTC · link
unlesss it's for children, just read books.

and if it is for your child, read them books.

[−]mitxela · 2026-10-11 Sun 11:25 UTC · link
Please don't raise your kids on AI slop. They'll grow up without knowing anything else.
[−]landgenoot · 2026-10-11 Sun 07:57 UTC · link
I have a laptop with soldered RAM. The motherboard upgrade to a 16GB variant was 120 EUR. Same price as the RAM soldered on it. It came with a CPU upgrade as well. I'm happy.
[−]Havoc · 2026-10-11 Sun 08:03 UTC · link
Was expecting the article to go deep into DDR3 land by tone of the title...

Something like 3200mhz DDR4 is still perfectly fine for 90% of consumer use. You really don't need more to look at cat pictures on facebook.

[−]walrus01 · 2026-10-11 Sun 08:11 UTC · link
The article doesn't go into detail about it, but if you go to eBay and find a really old Dell rack server that that does use DDR3 ECC Registered (such as an R910 or R920 with 512GB in it), they have significantly gained in value over the past 12-18 months. Or like an R720 with 256 or 512GB in it. Also major price jump in resale value. That's what we have come to now.
[−]cubefox · 2026-10-11 Sun 08:38 UTC · link
That 90% probably also includes computer games. I'm not sure whether those need fast main memory. They certainly need fast VRAM.
[−]dgellow · 2026-10-11 Sun 09:24 UTC · link
Most games do not, unless you want the best graphics. But then you’re out of the 90% use cases
[−]cubefox · 2026-10-11 Sun 10:02 UTC · link
Apparently mainly CPU (rather than GPU) limited games tend to benefit from DDR5: https://www.techspot.com/review/3059-ddr5-vs-ddr4-gaming/
[−]PunchyHamster · 2026-10-11 Sun 10:38 UTC · link
DDR4 have similar latency as DDR5 and that's what matters in all games, while raw bandwidth only matters in some games
[−]jacquesm · 2026-10-11 Sun 10:42 UTC · link
And raw bandwidth is a function of how many channels you've got as well. So a threadripper with 8 channels of DDR4 will run just fine even on heavy workloads.
[−]Tade0 · 2026-10-11 Sun 11:16 UTC · link
My old laptop has this exact RAM. Funny thing is that in terms of throughput it's on par with my current one, where I put just one 32GB stick, with one slot left for upgrades.

I still use it occasionally and it's really the old CPU and worn out SSD which slow it down.

[−]abletonlive · 2026-10-11 Sun 08:14 UTC · link
I just sold 4x8GB of DDR4 that I wasn't using for $200 on Ebay so this article is quite timely
[−]sehw · 2026-10-11 Sun 08:15 UTC · link
Post the archive link without paywall. Fool!
[−]shric · 2026-10-11 Sun 08:25 UTC · link
Please consider being more civil when you post, you’ll probably find it more enjoyable in the long run.

The archive link was posted [1] long before you posted. Also from the HN FAQ [2]:

> Are paywalls ok?

It's ok to post stories from sites with paywalls that have workarounds.

In comments, it's ok to ask how to read an article and to help other users do so. But please don't post complaints about paywalls. Those are off topic.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50040452

[2] https://news.ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html

[−]PunchyHamster · 2026-10-11 Sun 11:00 UTC · link
Yes, let's encourage absolute minimum effort when posting!
[−]sehw · 2026-10-11 Sun 08:16 UTC · link
[−]christkv · 2026-10-11 Sun 08:35 UTC · link
The crazy thing is knowing so many of the produced GPUs are just sitting in storage collecting dust because they don't have anywhere to plug them in and even where they have space do not have the power to run them. So basically the whole RAM situation is driven by things that are sitting dark in storage.
[−]PunchyHamster · 2026-10-11 Sun 10:49 UTC · link
Not GPUs. AI chips. no benefit to the customer
[−]wmchen · 2026-10-11 Sun 08:47 UTC · link
Adjadent to the article, there are some interesting builds with pulled parts from decommissioned servers in places where hardware is expensive or heavily taxed.

There's an entire parallel ecosystem around Chinese X79 and X99 boards [1](brands like Huananzhi and Machinist). They exist almost entirely to soak up scrap-tier Xeons and decommissioned server DDR3 and DDR4 ECC RAM that get pulled from datacenters for next to nothing. You see them online in Russian/Chinese/SE Asian online communities as budget builds, so nearly all the BIOS mods and documentation are in Russian or Chinese.

I think in NA we'd tend to write this hardware off as e-waste unless you're a homelabber (though I know Kimsufi still includes DDR3 builds in their catalogue). But in emerging markets, people have been squeezing real utility out of discarded enterprise silicon for a long time out of pure economic necessity. I've been tempted to do my own build but I already seek to have collected an overwhelmingly unnecessary amount of 2012-era workstations that I'm not sure my partner would appreciate an addition to.

[1] https://post.m.smzdm.com/talk/p/am9d3zv4/

[−]RobotToaster · 2026-10-11 Sun 08:51 UTC · link
I imagine those countries have sane energy prices compared to Western Europe.
[−]cinntaile · 2026-10-11 Sun 09:12 UTC · link
Energy is a commodity so the price will be very similar for the same goods. What they tack on as taxes might be different.
[−]stefanfisk · 2026-10-11 Sun 09:25 UTC · link
Energy means electricity in this case, and the EU prices are about 2-3x those paid in China AFAIK, for both residential and commercial.
[−]doikor · 2026-10-11 Sun 10:07 UTC · link
EU is big and prices vary. (Transfer capacity is limited)

Afaik electricity is around 7c/kWh in China. I got 8c/kWh 2y contract a couple weeks ago here in Finland. Though have to add 4c/kWh for transfer to that (no clue if the Chinese prices I could find include that). Commercial prices are less then that (no VAT and possibly lower power tax bracket. The 8c includes all taxes/fees)

[−]mitxela · 2026-10-11 Sun 11:24 UTC · link
Electricity cannot be shipped from one place to another in bulk quantities.
[−]RunSet · 2026-10-11 Sun 11:28 UTC · link
And data can be.

Which is why I suspect most nominal "data centers" are fronts for crypto mining, an activity that seeks out the cheapest energy.

[−]gib444 · 2026-10-11 Sun 10:38 UTC · link
Me too.

EU average is just under 29c/kWh (non-contract price) [0]

In the UK I got 27.5c/kWh (+ 58c/day fixed charge) on an 18-month contract a month ago

[0] https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php...

[−]b112 · 2026-10-11 Sun 11:18 UTC · link
I think in Quebec they've been paying me to use power.
[−]colechristensen · 2026-10-11 Sun 09:00 UTC · link
There are significant performance/energy ratio problems with older hardware, particularly with the rise of ARM.
[−]Retr0id · 2026-10-11 Sun 10:17 UTC · link
Until about 6 years ago I also mostly used ex-server "ewaste" hardware, because it's always been cheaper, except for electricity use which I wasn't paying for myself. My desktop in ~2015 was built from 2006-era hardware, with 32GB of ECC DDR2, which felt like a lot at the time.

My "6 years ago" build was with more typical current-gen consumer-grade hardware, because at that point I was on the hook for the electricity bill. I haven't thought about what my next build will look like because it's still going strong (aside from a flakey DIMM... so my next system will have ECC).

[−]broknbottle · 2026-10-11 Sun 11:06 UTC · link
The E5-2670v1 was goated for this back in 2016-2017. You could get them for like 25-50 bucks. I still have one of the supermicro boards I got from work in hardware decommissioning and one of the chinese franken-boards with a modded bios.
[−]project2501a · 2026-10-11 Sun 11:27 UTC · link
Typing this from an Asus X99 WS 3.1 with a E5-2696v4 . I got 256GB of RAM, sees only 128GB but I am sure with some overvoltage and lowering the ram speed it could see all 256GB.

if anybody got a tip, i'd be more than glad to listen, please.

[−]dgellow · 2026-10-11 Sun 09:32 UTC · link
I would be interested to see a comparison of the inflation caused by the AI rollout versus the actual value generated by the use of AI. I really wouldn’t be surprised if the later is dwarfed by the former (that’s assuming integrating AI in a company generates significant economic value in the first place, which is still speculative as far as I’m aware)
[−]everyone · 2026-10-11 Sun 09:35 UTC · link
I am still using the machine I built in 2017.. Prices for GPUs have been consistently insane since shortly after then, (NFT-idiots, crypto-bros, now AI-twats) and now ram.. My work setup uses 100% of my ram now though. I'd like to double my ram by getting 2 more of the same sticks I have in it.. But the exact same sticks of DDR4 now cost more than they did in 2017.
[−]veltas · 2026-10-11 Sun 09:48 UTC · link
Fact is that performance intensive code, games or whatever, has always optimised locality and so RAM speed shouldn't usually be a 1:1 impact on performance. Using older generations of slower RAM will be acceptable for many games and workloads.
[−]chaz6 · 2026-10-11 Sun 10:39 UTC · link
It is not just DDR4; I know of at least one supplier sampling units with DDR3 for their ONTs.
[−]lproven · 2026-10-11 Sun 10:45 UTC · link
Only a couple of my work machines use DDR4. Most of my own kit, both for work and for play, uses DDR3 which is cheap and plentiful.

I avoid dedicated GPUs which have always been a money-pit. I find modern video games dull and boring, and this is not offset by them being very very pretty. Gaming for me peaked with Quake II and there's been nothing of real interest since Portal and Untitled Goose Game.

[−]theturtletalks · 2026-10-11 Sun 10:56 UTC · link
This mentions DDR4, but I used to be in electronic recycling and I have still so much 1GB and 2GB DDR2 and DDR3 RAM. Happy to ship a couple of sticks if you guys could find a use. It’s going to scrap otherwise.